Loading...

Sri V Vidyasagar vs M/S Corner Shop on 14 November, 2008

Karnataka High Court
Sri V Vidyasagar vs M/S Corner Shop on 14 November, 2008
Author: B.V.Nagarathna
- 1 _

IN THE HIGH couaw or KARNAEAKA 3i BA§$£L¢3E,u"'k

DATED THIS THE 14"'nmx*QF7fi6vEMBEi 2§§$[7[
BEۤRE , _ A.,. . %
THE HON'BLE MR$.JU$Ti§E'B_V.§AG§RA§HNA
HRRP N5;34¢[2957{fi%11

BETWEEN

3. SKI V VID¥ASA§fiR '
'S/O.LAT5_P.a;vA;nYANATHAN,
AGED AEOQT 60 YEARS,
RiaT%No;31a8HAMTHINAGAR,
BANGALOREe2?,'.¥

.22 QMfiIC KOfiAR'S/O V VIQYASAGAR
" A3ED=gBouT 23 YEARS,
'-_R[RT%NG.31, SHANTHINAGAR.

. EAHQRLGRE-2?.
'z"-' ... PETITIONERS

 »{BY 8?} V ANANB & SR1 D.V.SRINIVRS, RDVS.,)

k*»ANn_

1. M/S CGRNBR SHOP
REP.BY ITS PROPRIETOR MR.AZE3



_ 2 ,

FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN .m_
CARRING on eusxwass RT N0;31/1;
MATHA KRUPA, g , i I
SHANTHINAGAR, BANGALORE¥2?; ' ._-__ ; ,
r._ ..; RESPCNBENT j

(BY SRI B N ANANTHANARAYAfiA:&_sRi*--E"'
D.G.CHINNAPPA GOWQR, ADBS;,} ' '

THIS HRRP IS  F:LEaf*U/$5f46111 OF THE
KARNATAKA RENT-- ACT "A$RINS?, fa: 5dknER DATED
13.07.20074HéAésEn. INi éR¢QN¢f1eG97/04 on THE
FILE OE' %g£f*x§ 2A§b3}&v§Gég'=CouRT OF SMALL
CAUSES¢""MAiC  fiAnL*fgN:é;"~3KNGALoRE, scan-19,
axsnxséxus THE §STiTi0N FILED U/S.27{2)(r} OF
KARNATAKA,RENTaA¢T; %:""

THIS "HR:§9..'co§s;IN'<é ON E-'OR ADMISSION THIS

-*.pAYgfTg¢'QQuRf"MamE THE FOLLOWING:

ORflER

 Thoufifi;  this matter is psted for

u*k admiséigh, learned counsel on both sides

x'= éubmit that the matter is settled out of Court

"WW gnfi accordingly, a joint memo has been filed

/&



...3..

whereby, the respondent wtenant undertei¥§.es..te

vacate and deliver vacant possessi_r;§fi<-.'of_::the

schedule premises to the petit.ien_e"re"–..:on or.

before 28.2.2010 and the pe.r§A::vt'iog£1;e:~s"»nr§j5z-gin

undertake to refund a7 sum

the time of vacating .sCh'edLl:le oremises.
The respondent to pay rents

regularly .n1=nti1_.w–h_e'V.'v-vé1cé.t'e$':-.i.vV*–the schedule

premises A."

‘V Tlj1e*””jox:’a.nt memo is taken on record.

the learned counsel for the

‘V and the learned counsel for the

r’esponde~nt who also submit that they have

_ 3;nst’r1.}ctions to file this joint memo pursuant

the settlement between the parties. The

—{items of the joint memo are as follows:

$4

-4-

“The respondent is a tenant under that

petitioners on a menthly flrentya¢ating the schedule

premiae$;a *TheF respondent undertakes

_ro pey the rents till he vacate and

[5deiiyer hack the vacant possession of

‘*»_the,eehefiu1e premises. The respondent

v*i endk the” petitioners pray that the

‘,iabQ§e;§etition may be allowed granting

time till 28.2.2010 to the respondent

“*«_te vacate the premises in the interest

Vof justice.”

/’/’=

-5-

3. In View of the 駢{é Setflefiéfitg

this revision petition is dis§osedjQf,

4. Office Vie. dig§@{¢d¢\to flféfi up a
decree in terms of thé jdffi§¢@émQ§
‘ Iudge

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies. More Information