High Court Karnataka High Court

State Of Karntaka By Circle … vs Jayamma W/O Raddi Naika on 29 July, 2008

Karnataka High Court
State Of Karntaka By Circle … vs Jayamma W/O Raddi Naika on 29 July, 2008
Author: K.Sreedhar Rao Gowda
H'? mm $113!'! GQIXRI OF KARHATAKA AT BANGALQRE 

Datedth'nthe29m day efJu1y,2008
:PRE8EHT:

mm z~::;m'3m mmmwrxcn ELSREEIJHAR;   Cf 

AND

ma aoflmm am. wanes B.s123:n?ajrI\;r;i_i.si~::    " X

 

EEFWEEN :

smm GB' mmrrmm      A
BY cmum mamcmn op 12€:LI¢':m W A  " 

wmfi _j  

my 3:: ;  5?'-';£';_€.¢.T1Fz,:.'.'E~:'v.'2'r~2E"I1'~'«-}--v..... 

AME

3

 1ag;::i-.m,nmaw

.,m¥n§m£"w}'e Ema: 
.%§'ij?e1':4;3.YEARS=..,. é

   

.

%3;aL;:sm cnamvmmum

mRfi?flW%
Wflfifimmmflflfiwn

..$ RE mum

%% ~ pxmmawamm

‘;’rr~zm’mA am we mmmm
_ awmzas mans

W’ 0 .mmwaxAHnm”rI
ummmm mntm

MQNMWAWQ

wmfimmawmm
Nfimfifflfii

H} C} JA%YYAflAI-IAYTTI
fl RE TALUK

mammmms~~—- I ”

{E.ysrs:m3.aaxa2PAnGImMA1AH,Anv.a; 4
am”. KawEMULmsmmmR R__1~£*_1′) ; ‘

mm GRLJL. FILED 1115 am; 11 aLis%%:a)=;%'<:a;;1=§<:.+
SEPP ME THE mam Emma THAI Ema }iQN'ELE1«. "
mum mar as FLWED m Gfififim 1.Eav3::.m_F£x,E

APPEAL &flAI1'i$'i' 'rm Junamnmmf 30;1_1;m'.=m',a.c.
N0. Qfiffifl' cm 'THE FILE OF"-.,,_im Axum… %s.J.
amrmnnaaa. Acqumma 23:sPo1wE:ma{
Accusmn 1 T0 4 ma £DFF,EH$_LiE 't:;'a.'5o4, 302. 114
Rgw. 3411111.

Wm appea;    this day,

   

'§'§-me:  4'    was is that

ciemawcl    meals on 22.9.98 at

«§m:…&-unt~ya1’ri of the house. A1 to

of the dccmasad. A1 dealibvarataly

of dwaad had assaulted her

~~ rmulmcl in medical mp-mm of

~ and amrtad abuuing. A1 to A4 dnuacd flu

Wm: kwmana and act Em and hcarmg the

, PW? (awn and PW5 ciaughtxzr-in–}aw of the

d%$e::d} mm tn the scans and; took the decaeaaed ta

tbs P’!’§.ma.:’j Hwlth Cmfle by bullock-eart. PW16 the

figg,

dmemr :31″ Primary Health Cmtm gave fimt-aid

amt ‘mfi’:3rmed the police by phone. PW11

Conatszble came: to the smw and H

ammmmt at Ex.F~5. Ex.F–5 (c) ‘3

rm ham’ at 533-5, 3 case: is;

accused far an ofihnm punk

mad wfih socmn 34 of’:

2:1-mtmm at c1a&u~adurgӎV an
23.93% at mat. dhclosw
that me dmtnis % was accused is
cmw 302 ma with
samm

” material witnesses In the

have mrnod hostile and did not

* mama

%1m1iL (Hm Constable) mwrdad Ex.P~5 and

ma fia-ct that has had rewmxmd a phone

V[ mad. rmdsd ummmmt af deemed at £3.35

ma pmane-.=r1m cf FWIG. The evidtmee at the dacmr

Fwlfi +m’Jr:’1:”%t’.Ihm’at1$ Ex.?~5 recorded in his px-marina the

mdammt is at Ex.P-5(9). PW16 amwd that

gm-sea the s’ta’beme:m: vchxntariky and she .,

fis, seam uf mm’ :3 to five stanmexxt. The trial H

mm mm mm au1danc:e’ is dsampmaz 7

ammw pewaonsw Ham, the state . «. ”


4." fin tharough  
the mamiai witrmaam    hostile,

the wmrm   of dying '

amwuam Tm jg-é»='¥    fiw11 zmordad
stamnrm-.nt.     amtemmt
at E::;P--5    dhclaaau that it was

mmmm: an doctor PW16 and the

figgmr at Ex.fL5(c). He has aha

t’}1a§;§:’ was in a fit state of mind &

vnhxnmxily which was rmrded

.. it; prmenoe. ‘the oontxmm of E-x.P-5

the assumed fin: mmsing mlxrdax with

émmmien.

5% m. samw Rmaiah mm counsel appeanng”

fiw th-»s:~:;. %mw-reupnnda=nm atzvemunzmly argued that

my

trw amusexl have not caused thus nzmrderr of

dammed. “% material wzitramaaas ham also

hmatélm. The mutual furthew axguaaaci that in ma M

ofmfifi it is elicited tlmt the hands

fezslly burnt imludm fingara. Twin:

$fi pLn:11’ng L’I’M an Ex.P-V3′
amwmg LTM at’ the dwnfim:-,g_d
an!’ % dhchsag V a.i’bm’ the
irmivtivemfi, has that the
d%a1=:ed was theory of

dymg

an aim the domzmenm, wa

,v§3_9_LlH. ha attached an the evidence

have turned lmatile. Pwm is an

_ that than dmaocl man a atatzamamt at

“it is wrhlnmlfly and that she was in a fit

.a§;*£é:t:e:”;a::nf tan gm her at:at%1t. The evidence of

zamwmflmthex-aoordedstammentinthexnmenoa

cf FWIIE and E33-5 oamaim tha anderaswmzt; of the

dmmr.Thse1°a*sm:goodransonhud’nbelimm1’11e