Posted On by &filed under Allahabad High Court, High Court.


Allahabad High Court
Suresh & Another vs State Of U.P. & Another on 29 January, 2010
Court No. - 50

Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 379 of 2010

Petitioner :- Suresh & Another
Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Another
Petitioner Counsel :- Praval Tripathi
Respondent Counsel :- Govt. Advocate

Hon'ble Mrs. Poonam Srivastava,J.

Heard learned counsel for the revisionists.

Order dated 07.1.2010 passed by Addl. Sessions Judge Court
No.3, Mau on an application under section 319 Cr.P.C. is
impugned in the instant revision.

The revisionist were named accused in the First Information
Report. After recording statement of PW1 first informant, the
order was passed summoning the revisionist to face trial along
with other accused.

I have perused the First Information Report and impugned orders
as well as statement of the witness Ram Chandra Yadav s/o Murli
Yadav. I do not find any illegality in the impugned order. Revision
lacks merit and is accordingly dismissed.

It is brought to my notice that all the other accused who are facing
trial have been allowed bail. In the event revisionists appear within
a period of ten days from today before court below and move bail
application, the same shall be considered expeditiously ,
preferably, if possible on the same day.

Order Date :- 29.1.2010
S.A.A.Rizvi


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *

8 queries in 0.120 seconds.