High Court Punjab-Haryana High Court

Swaran Singh vs State Of Haryana on 16 April, 2009

Punjab-Haryana High Court
Swaran Singh vs State Of Haryana on 16 April, 2009
 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH



                     Criminal Miscellaneous No. M-3797 of 2009
                                    Date of Decision: April 16, 2009


Swaran Singh
                                                         .....PETITIONER(S)

                                VERSUS


State of Haryana
                                                     .....RESPONDENT(S)
                            .     .        .


CORAM:             HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA


PRESENT: -         Mr.   Kamal    Jeet   Singh   Sidhu,

Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Sunil Nehra, Assistant Advocate
General, Haryana

. . .

AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral)

This petition has been filed under

Section 439 Cr.P.C. for bail to the petitioner in

case FIR No.162 dated 19.8.2003, under Section 15 of

Narcotics Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985,

with Police Station, Sadar Dabwali, District Sirsa.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has

pointed out that no recovery was effected from the

petitioner. As per the admitted case of the

respondent, the petitioner was not apprehended at

the spot. There is a statement of the co-accused

against the petitioner which cannot be termed as

legal evidence as it leads to no recovery. The
Crl. Misc. No. M-3796 of 2009 [2]

petitioner on his own surrendered on 9.6.2008 and

has been in custody since then.

Learned counsel for the respondent-

State has pointed out that the petitioner was

identified by his co-accused. Only one witness

remains to be examined i.e. Lambardar.

I have considered the contentions of

learned counsel for the parties.

Statement of the Lambardar recorded

under Section 161 Cr.P.C. has been read in Court

which indicates that the Lambardar did not know the

petitioner by name. Only the physical appearance has

been given out. The petitioner has been in custody

since 9.6.2008.

Without commenting on the merits of

the case, this petition is allowed.

Bail to the satisfaction of the Trial

Court.

Heavy surety.


                                                              (AJAI LAMBA)
April 16, 2009                                                   JUDGE
avin