High Court Kerala High Court

T.S.Swaminathan vs The Transport Commissioner on 24 June, 2009

Kerala High Court
T.S.Swaminathan vs The Transport Commissioner on 24 June, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 17585 of 2009(P)


1. T.S.SWAMINATHAN, THERAYANKODE
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE TRANSPORT COMMISSIONER,
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.I.DINESH MENON

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON

 Dated :24/06/2009

 O R D E R
                     P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J.
                    -----------------------------------------------
                        WP(C) NO. 17585 OF 2009
                          -----------------------------------
                   Dated this the 24th day of June, 2009


                                   JUDGMENT

With regard to the fixation of liability under the Motor Vehicles

Taxation Act, the statutory appeals preferred by the petitioner were

directed to be considered Ext.P5 judgment passed by this Court; pursuant

to which, the appellate authority arrived at a finding that the petitioner was

very much liable to satisfy the demand. Met with the circumstances, the

petitioner preferred Ext.P6 and P7 revision petitions in respect of the two

different vehicles KL 9 T 5712 and KL 9 U 1282 before the respondent

along with Ext.P8 and P9 petitions for stay and the said proceedings are

still pending.

2. The case of the petitioner is that, it is without any regard to the

pendency of the above proceedings that the respondent has caused the

machinery under the Kerala Revenue Recovery Act to be moved against

the petitioner, which hence is sought to be interfered by this Court in the

present Writ Petition.

3. Heard the learned Government Pleader as well.

WPC NO. 17585/2009 2

4. Considering the facts and circumstances, the Writ Petition is

disposed of, directing the respondent to consider and finalise the revision

petitions as well as petitions for stay in accordance with law, as

expeditiously as possible. However, it is made clear that, till such orders

are passed on Ext.P8 and P9 petitions for stay, all coercive steps stated as

being pursued against the petitioner shall be kept in abeyance.

The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly.

(P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE)

dnc