' "€J1iti~adu2*%:a 'T9'Wa 4577' 501.
_ appeal is filed under Section 30(1) of WC. Act
V'agaii1st '£113 judgment dated 26.96.2007 passed in
L_GC."J_VC.(2R.94/2{)O6 on the tile of the Labour Ofiicer and
.Cdn1m%issioner for 'Workmen's Compensation, Chittagtiurga
_ Qistiict, Chitradurga, partly allowing the claim petition for
._co'mpensation and seeking enhancement of compensation.
IN mm HIGH CGURT or KARKATAKA AT 3.&NGALORE
nmrmn THI8 THE 2911: new or AUGUST 2GQx8
BEFORE: _ ' 4'
THE Hon"aLE MRJUBTICE 8.8. ' 7.1': % V
M.F.A. Ho.864-3 or
nmwmn: A» t' " F' K
Tansirkhan,
S/o.}ate shahabuddin Khan,
Age: 20 years,
R/o. Assar Mohalla, , _ ._ 3 *
Chitradurga Town. j.A.PPELLA!l'!'
(By sxi.B.pramqd,--2§civ.)
ARI):
1.
Anwar Bas”ha, ‘1- A -. ~-
S/ o. Mohammeii ‘E–:I1_1sS»ain,. ‘V V .
Major, V . ‘ ” % ‘ _
Owner of béaf
Reg.No.KA.i@_/A.799.. A ”
Rfo.Hc13.se NoI18,1’7V,5
– Nehntf-{Nagar, ” ”
2. % “A:}ii;–1s,i;mgva_1<
The Orie1:t'iaI_v~I31$;1iranoe Co. Ltd.,
Kesh§1vap11m;:–.;tiub1i -~– 580 001. REBPONDENTS
3. The assertions made in the aflidavit filed by the
appellant cannot be believed as there: are no pa1ticu.1ai34′ gi§ren
as to when the appeal was filed or when Q16′ «’
communicated to him regarding the filing of
fact that for a period of nearly one yjéar
take any steps to find out what ha1)–p€ned to,’v~’i11’§:” éo
appeal which he had enfiusted ‘£0 Adv€r::.Vf:1fl:[ discloses
that he is not diligcnfi The
statement made by not inspire
confidence. H:e;2’é~;§ ;V:~ .Iori§gVV’ ‘cielay of 365 days
cannot be ‘ the application for
condonaiian consequently the appeal
is also dismiss€:d._ V’ _ ‘
._ V Sd/-3
….. Iudgs