$24 . AgE;1. - 1 .. IN THE HIGH comm" OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 39*" DAY 0? MAY 2011 M PRESENT THE HOMBLE MR. JUSTICE v. G.SA_E3H2_\ h=IT:~A./,::' 3 AND THE HON"BLE MR.3us.m_:E RAvi"MALIEM-Aim Q' 1.
T.A.N0.i’S/.?§01_1 V
BETWEEN: V’ V K % 3
1. The C0mmiss§onerVV_ofT’ ‘ gy
C.R.Buiiding,…Qu§_ens I ”
Bangaiosfe. V . ”
2′ The Ir’1g:d’me~tax;
Ci rcies 6E3 ) ,. ‘i”»:’}_z.§ m ba
3. The ;–»’>>.ss’i.<-'.€Vz5':ij't~.CV0ErfiWfiS3icner of Income Tax
Circle?1%1(4)_,'C'.'R."B_g1IEd'i'ngs, Queens Road
Bangal_or+:=:. . " . APPELLANTS
«_ {Byj»»:-iré.v _lL'9§.\V/. S.é"s'hag:_Eja.ia, Advocate)
MKS–..4__In§.E:*E.§'EiATRand (India) Lt<:i.§.
Soiitaife" Corporate Park=~IV
~.__"~uAnTit N63241: E 412
.51 F'fC.9r, Andheri-Kuria Read
_ ' –A'z"2–€§?_i33:'§ {E}; Mamba: RESi3Qf%§DEf'éT
Yhés £3352 fiéeé anger §EC§§*iZr%"§ 25§~»& cf §.7f%€{, 2%:
arégérzg aw: sf mafia? fiated 3%}-'S-2G}.§ pagsefi in I.T,§x.§'§G,
-2″
‘E158/Mum;’2OQS for the assessment year 200252-Q03,
praying to formulate the substantéai questions ef.._t’aw
stated therein and to show the aepeai and set asid’e.”fth’e,.
drders passed by the {TAT Bangaiore
N0.?1S8fMum/2005, dated 30-O8~201O and ~;:dnfi-raid-fid§1ee””e V’ 4_
order of the Appefiate Commissioner C€)f§fiIff’.”.~§!}€j:”~th’€_:0FC§€3fu ”
passed by the Assistant Commie-sieh-er cf I.ii’t(fe:;-v$’I”:€ Te>g:
The Eearhed Ceunset appeiiants by
filing a memofsuhrffiits shaft hot interested in
pursuing the of this Court te
withd JV’ ‘ ‘ »
2. View thesdbmission made by the learned
Coufinisevi h;a.pg3ea”ri’-:’3w_«,f;rf’dr:the appellants; appeal is dismissed
.as’w_ithdr’Va\::.;§;<–..V
Sdfe
§§§§E
Edie?
§§D§E