High Court Madras High Court

The Kcp Ltd vs The Superintending Engineer on 30 March, 2011

Madras High Court
The Kcp Ltd vs The Superintending Engineer on 30 March, 2011
       

  

  

 
 
 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated  30.3.2011

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR

Writ Petition No.8048 of 2011 
and
M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2011
 


The KCP Ltd., 
(HT SC No.1044),
P.B.No.227, Basin Road,
Thiruvotriyur,
Chennai-600 019,
represented by its
Technical Director
V.Gandhi.                                                             ... Petitioner  

-Vs.-
 
The Superintending Engineer,
Chennai Electricity Distribution Circle (North)
Tamil Nadu Electricity Board,    
Chennai-600 002.                                                 ... Respondent 


	Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing  the respondent to implement 20% power cut and allow the petitioner to achieve the quota demand of 3400 KVA and utilize the quota energy of 7,19,504 units every month from March, 2011 and to permit the petitioner to utilize/consume the energy generated/banked through wind mills in addition to the quota fixed and prepare the CC bill accordingly instead of fixing the quota demand of 2562 KVA and quota energy of 16401 units and consequently direct the respondent to refund the total sum of Rs.12,37,292/- to the petitioner wrongly levied and collected towards penalty (Rs.4,05,884/- from June 2010 to September 2010 and Rs.8,31,408/- in February, 2011).


	For petitioner 	: 	Mr.Palaniselvaraj,
					 
	For respondent  	: 	Mr.A.Selvendran.
	
  -----

O R D E R

Writ Petition is filed praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to implement 20% power cut and allow the petitioner to achieve the quota demand of 3400 KVA and utilize the quota energy of 7,19,504 units every month from March, 2011 and to permit the petitioner to utilize/consume the energy generated/banked through wind mills in addition to the quota fixed and prepare the CC bill accordingly instead of fixing the quota demand of 2562 KVA and quota energy of 16401 units and consequently direct the respondent to refund the total sum of Rs.12,37,292/- to the petitioner wrongly levied and collected towards penalty (Rs.4,05,884/- from June 2010 to September 2010 and Rs.8,31,408/- in February, 2011).

2. Mr.A.Selvendran, learned counsel takes notice on behalf of the respondent electricity board. By consent of both the parties, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal.

3. Petitioner is a consumer of High Tension Electricity Power supply under HT SC No.1044. Petitioner’s grievance is that in spite of the power cut restrictions imposed under letter No.SE/CEDC/NORTH/AEE/GL./ F.Power cut / D.1103/2009 dated 15.6.2009, respondent department has arbitrarily reduced the demand quota and energy quota thereby the petitioner is mulcted with penalty for exceeding the quota restrictions. Petitioner in this regard frequently complained by way of letters addressed to the department about the reduction in quota in the monthly bills, without any basis. The last of the letter is dated 5.3.2011 and that has been acknowledged by the respondent. It is fairly stated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that in order to avoid disconnection and maintain cordiality, petitioner is paying the amount as per the bill raised. However, their objections that the reduction in the demand quota and energy quota is arbitrary has been set out in the letters.

4. In this regard, it is stated by the petitioner that the Superintending Engineer, Chennai (North) Circle, has been repeatedly requested to reconsider and restore the demand quota and energy quota as per proceedings dated 15.6.2009 which has not been do so far. Hence, the present writ petition has been filed.

5. At this point of time, this Court is not inclined to consider the merits and the demerits of the petitioner’s claim, except to direct the respondent to consider the representation/letter dated 5.3.2011 within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order on all aspects of the claim made as per law and pass a reasoned order on merits. Petitioner shall also be given personal hearing in this matter before deciding the issue.

6. The Writ Petition is disposed of as above. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

Index:    No                                                        30.3.2011

Internet:Yes 

ts

To

The Superintending Engineer,
Chennai Electricity Distribution Circle (North)
Tamil Nadu Electricity Board,    
Chennai-600 002.   
R.SUDHAKAR,J.


ts.









                                                                                Order in 
                                                                     W.P.No.8048 of 2011 
                                                                          Date 30.3.2011