High Court Karnataka High Court

The Registrar vs East West Institute Of Technology on 19 November, 2008

Karnataka High Court
The Registrar vs East West Institute Of Technology on 19 November, 2008
Author: K.Sreedhar Rao& Gowda
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, Onaczlijrrf
AT DHARWAD.  '    

DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY_QF._NO\*E1\§B §9§'R; A "

PREsEfiTif=T V  
THE HONBLE MR.JO*Si'TOE   * %
  % 
THE HONBLE Ma'gifisficfiiiTB§sm3ETI:vAsE GOWDA
gf%.v.A.§NOj. $96/'£093 V'(E}'§N).

        T '

1. THE   
\fI.'3_VESVA1?iAXfATTECHNOLOGICAL
ONnzERsrTY,,-BELOALIM --- 590 0 :4,
KARNATAKA'*S'1'.étF1!5',;'--...T.  APPELLANT

(BY_§;M/S.BASAVA  PRABHU s. PATIL ASSOCIATES, ADVS.)

 It.§' EiAS'f"'§1i?E;€$'WNSTYFUTE Oi? TECHNOLOGY,

' .._SU1'ijVEY,~N0.63, OFF MAGADE ROAD,
VESHWANEEDAM POST,
BARGQQRE ~-- 550 O9 1,

% T' * REPRESENTED BY

Aim' ~ 

.,THE ADMINISTRATOR, SR1 FLDEEPAK.

ANAND MURTHY V.K.
S] O V. KRISHNAMIJIRTHY,
AGE: 28 YEARS;



BADARI PRASAD R.
S/O NLALITHAMBA,

AGED: 27 YEARS;
BALACHANDRA H.

S/O LATE H. ANNA RAG,
AGE: 46 YEARS; r

GAFAR ASIF ABDUL,

s/0 LATE ABDUL M

AGE: 27 YEARS;   

. GANESI-I K.A: 36 

.* »K1RAm§B. 

% ..;s/*0.§;.% BA~SAVARAJAP?A,
= . £=*.---GEI}:-- 2;5érEARs;

 10. ' ?;R?':sI?INA R.

S/Ci LATE RAMA,

" «--..A{1'vED: 23 YEARS;

HLOKESHA me.
s/0 NARAYANAPPA,
AGED: 30 YEARS;

%/



12. M.vm2AM RAJU,
s/0 NARAYANA,
AGED: 22 YEARS;

13. MOHAN KUMAR. 0.
sm OMKARAPPA,
AGED: :25 YEARS;

14. RAJU 3R. 
s/0 RUDRAsHE'f'1'Y B;R. *  % A 
AGED: 25 YEARS;    *

15.    % 
s/0 VENK'ATASbIBBMAfi,A "  x 
AGED=%-33.      

16. SANTSSQ  
s/0 S"1*~iE'i;?AM3'_JI€'J7I1'Y V._MURTHY,
AGED: 28 ~ _ %

17. §?.v..jL'L.4%
S/Q VENKATAPPA,
V...  22 'YEARS;

 18.» 2 UMEs:+I NAYAKA,

 S;*.O"-;§§A€}A--RAJA N,

 % X' ""AGE£}':'j_3f1 YEARS;

 19. xtmxiiszsfl,

.%  3/a'M.N.vmUPAKsHA,
"mm: 24 YEARS;

  Rjsspoxnmrrrs 2 -- 19 M.TEcH COURSE IN
,  * -"MECHANICAL ENGINEERING AT RESPONDENT No. 1.

20. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
TO GOVERNMENT,
TECHNOLOGICAL EDUCATION
DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILI)ING, , i i i _
BANGALORE. — 550 001. RESPOi*I_i)E£*1TFS.’i –

WA IS FILED U/S.4 01? KA}éN’ATA§KA;«uI{fl:C%sI£: c’r*– day’,

SREEDHAR RAG, J., glclivcrqsl L1¢’fQI1oWit1g:_f–

The._ filed against the interim order

passed The Writ petition is ciisposed

_ of. ,. 4iijI€fI1i3’€, thé appea} is dismissed as infmctuous.

Sd/-r
Judge

Sd/–s

.fl’….3:1Esrb. Judge