IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
WP(C).No. 863 of 2010(G)
1. TOUGHGLASS INDIA PVT.LTD,
... Petitioner
Vs
1. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
... Respondent
2. KERALA HEAD LOAD AND GENERAL WORKERS
3. KERALA HEAD LOAD AND GENERAL WORKERS
4. KERALA HEAD LOAD AND GENERAL WORKERS
For Petitioner :SRI.PEEYUS A.KOTTAM
For Respondent :SRI.DINESH MATHEW J.MURICKEN
The Hon'ble MR. Justice P.R.RAMAN
The Hon'ble MR. Justice P.S.GOPINATHAN
Dated :13/01/2010
O R D E R
P.R.RAMAN & P.S.GOPINATHAN, JJ.
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=
W.P.(C) No. 863 of 2010
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=
Dated this the 13th day of January, 2010
JUDGMENT
Raman, J.
Notice served on the party respondents to Special
Messenger.
2. The petitioner is a Private Ltd. Company which is
proposing to start a factory and building. Loading and
unloading work of the goods at the time of construction of
the building is entrusted to respondents 3 and 4 and other
civil matter is entrusted to general workers with the choice
of the petitioner. According to him, respondents 2 to 4 are
insisting for the civil works to be alloted them and causing
obstruction.
3. The 2nd respondent entered appearance through the
counsel and submitted that they will not insist for giving any
civil work to them and since they are already given work
pertaining to loading and unloading of building materials.
W.P.(C) No. 863/2010 2
Accordingly, submission that they will not be insisting for
any civil work to be done in the premises as alleged, is
recorded.
4. In the facts and circumstances, there will be a
direction that in case any obstruction is caused insisting for
any civil work, such obstruction will be removed by the 1st
respondent by giving effective police protection.
The writ petition is accordingly closed.
P.R.RAMAN, JUDGE
P.S.GOPINATHAN, JUDGE.
mn.