High Court Karnataka High Court

Uday C Javali vs The New India Assurance Company … on 9 March, 2010

Karnataka High Court
Uday C Javali vs The New India Assurance Company … on 9 March, 2010
Author: Lok Adalath
HIGH CQIJRT LEGAL SERVICES {1'.<I)M1'viI"1"1_"I§2;}¥1, BA.N'(..§A}.J('Ii.§{i§',1
BEFORE THE LOX ADALAT
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KA¥€fNA'E'AKA A'? BALN(}A!g£)}<fE

BATEB THIS THE 39"' flAY (IF  2911? 
CQN€ILIA:'°i"QR$  T

HGZDPBLE MR. msrxcg L.NAm¥A§JA3w&;%a§§'f:'%7 ':  
A1-I3  %  .
sR:.1\Ls.sAM?AN§fi2A;naam:~:,»m;:em§;§:»  '  

Miscellafieous First Agmai    
(Lek Adalat No.,»TI19j_7/ 20 3.6}  ' A .

BETWEEN:

UDAY C.JA\7£xLi

S f€3r.CHANNABASAPPA,

AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,

R/Q,F~50.D--9, BLOCK HI

SILK 33339 STAFF QUARTERS,

MADIWAIA,      ; _
BANGALORE»-'.'?5. H _. _  ,  '  ..A.?PELLAli'T

 _ {n1'_sR.;'=~v.sR.;K1§;.§_s, AI)VOCA'I'E}
1.

THE NEu{.i:§:32A A$suRA.;NCE’=_
Co:v1pA1°%¢’§_’f’ “*x;;*:3¢, ” . _

. ” E37_FL€3C_}E;. vQKKga:.:€;AR’A vl%.}«.3§,«’V$N;
” ; HU[:2SOI’$ <::iP<:LE_.~_
"Br%'NC%f:f;G'R~E -*~'~'~?3'?* _

pg. sii'1£.NY',__ .

. _ Rj£’–:T;N'{3′. 161, 2’r«’:?j_ ,r«?.:;;:;>::2£2,
‘ aw CR(3SS,§%3’P5Z’¢i%’§ii*i,
2ND STAGE, 151 PHASE,
~ ~ _E%1f§\M, L.aJ£c>Ui:;

zsgmnekpeagww v5. ..RE$?6l?é’§EI¥”£”$

” V’ SR1. A..K.KRI$HN.a. $WA.MY, .$33VG€A’T¥} Féfifi R-1}

é.;iFA?F:L§;:} mfg 173:1} <3? mi ACT' _N 1′–‘s.§’éI’) SEEKING
ENHANCEMENT’ OF Cifihéfi-‘§f}NSA”i”I(f)N.

THE APPEAL COMIEQG ON FOR C{}NC1LiA’iI’1()N 7Li§}1*’=:;}i~€£s; Lziffiii; £1i*’l’h;.%€
BE-{NC} REFERRED VIBE} C3§{DER I_L3fi.e’1″E:2];’f.> {):;黣}E-‘2Ul:}, )§i”UZ’e=””~V;f’1;Q”£;.§;§;,}\’vis’§.§33{.}
CONCILIATEON ORDERIS PASSE1}. *

CQNCILIATEGK GREEK

Th:-3 leajmed. cotmsel for the cla1fi1a:3rw:1ppé§:.£:»;§zi;IV’ :_»:.:i’:vr£_’L”- :%?:é;’

leamsd coimsel for the Irlstlrance
reprf:se1″1tative: are pmsent. 9 I T V < V

2. After prolonged I’1t:’g()?;i’é3;’§._i&'(,>I1$;’W’§i£4fé; fi;a§:ttE3;£¥« ‘Vii; ‘é:::tf,ic:(i. The
appfirflant ~–C31aima_nt has agz’c=;eVa*1.’ the Respondern;-«
Insgurance !3on:pa:1373%:a::§L;éJ;g*e%d #11111 of Rs. 1E,i,()£}(}j~

{Rupees Fifteen Tfio11$’a_1_r1E1″e1′;a§j’}T’i’.i:3§::§;1.:si\?e: Cof interest, in acidifézm 1:0

what has beeIi”–.a1vaIrde§1′ ‘3f’.§§§_ in fa}? Eiflfi finzgi 5;e%.t§€::’:’§€::’:
91″ the claim. A j<ii3:?=__fi. _%'v§§%'I:~:e:3'§_:~§ ffifed aim £3{=:%1a.if«:":§' '{.E:é.% §§;:s::'°t.ée:e; Sf} :'.%§§:s:-,

3. t’I’}1eji§”1’3f.es;2§:i1<2€i:1':?i*, .:_~»1nsu:'a§1<:«:-i' €:€}II1p§iI3}<' hag agrfiafi :0 aiegsaaiz

said }::a:rjria:,;¥"L:ri'?tL the Tréblmai withir: six. 'W€?€':3k$ .§"€)II§ iiixe ziateé:

_ préparatiéfi award, faiiing which the sairi z»mm'2.2:1'f. rghaéi CS.FE§'

emf Lihe %'at€ (}f 9% pa, fmm 'aha date 9? defamii; '{3}: ins éiaie

% " 0g&ami;?% /\

\'_

3

5%. Th:i_s I1’1i${f€iH8fl{fOE_iS firm. ;::_g:apr:s<..<r::.§_ 49%":
Ehsf: Ji::1r. Illiiffllilt “E’1’1:=r z;32w:2′<i (::f'_" ¥;:it':e:_% 'i"'§",a;.%.":é.:'.s"::2§ %é.:'§_;–§'§""::fE§<; §'E'ssT.'%2"%'%:?Eéf*?€!§

3CCOrdiI1g1§s, _E,}1'av; 21;) i.:E':e Aw;31's:'i ?3€T'.{".'»'.'"3E'4Z§}E"'ég'§'z.-'..

Sd