Supreme Court of India

Union Of India Th.G.M.,Western … vs Fataji Chaturji & Ors on 11 September, 2008

Supreme Court of India
Union Of India Th.G.M.,Western … vs Fataji Chaturji & Ors on 11 September, 2008
Bench: Tarun Chatterjee, Aftab Alam
                                                             1


         IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
          CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

        CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5606 OF 2008
     (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 16684 of 2008)


Union of India through General Manager,
Western Railway, Mumbai & Anr.         ....Appellants

Versus

Fataji Chaturji & Ors.                    ...Respondents


                         ORDER

1. Leave granted.

2. This is an appeal filed at the instance of Union of

India against the Judgment and final order dated

29th of December, 2005 passed by the High Court

of Gujarat in Civil Application Nos. 12992 to

13002 of 2005 with Letters Patent Appeal Nos.

1446 to 1456 of 2005, by which the High Court

had refused to condone the delay of 148 days in

filing the Letters Patent Appeals.
2

3. We have heard Mr. B. Dutta, learned Additional

Solicitor General, appearing for the appellants

and Mr. Vimal Chandra S. Dave, learned counsel

appearing for the respondents and considering

the facts and circumstances of the case and the

explanations offered by the appellants in their

application for condonation of delay, we are of

the view that the delay in filing the LPAs must be

condoned and LPAs be restored to its original file.

Accordingly, we order the same.

4. The High Court is therefore requested to dispose

of the LPAs on merits and in accordance with law

within a period of eight weeks from the date of

supply of a copy of this order to it. It is also

made clear that at the time of hearing of the

LPAs, it would be open to the parties to question

the maintainability of the appeal before the

Division Bench, which shall also be taken into

consideration at the time of such disposal.
3

5. Accordingly, the impugned orders of the High

Court are set aside. The appeal is thus allowed

to the extent indicated above. There will be no

order as to costs.

……………………….J.
[Tarun Chatterjee]

New Delhi; ………………………J.
September 11, 2008. [Aftab Alam]