CRM No. M-21304 of 2009 1
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB &
HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
CRM No. M-21304 of 2009 (O&M)
Date of decision: 24.8.2009
Vinod Kumar & others ...Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana & others ...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA
Present: Mr. KS Dhanora, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Rajan Gupta, J.
Contends that the petitioners are being harassed being
relatives of Ashok Kumar, who has married to Suman Rani. According
to the counsel, the petitioners are being harassed at the instance of
relatives of Suman Rani. He has submitted that an application in this
regard has been submitted to respondent No.2.
Notice of motion.
On the asking of the court, Mr. Tarun Aggarwal, Senior
DAG, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of State of Haryana. Learned
State counsel submits that representation, Annexure P-2 dated 30.7.2009
shall be examined by respondent No.2.
In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the
State, prayer made in this petition has been rendered infructuous.
Dismissed as such.
CRM No. M-21304 of 2009 2
A copy of this order be given to the learned State counsel
under the signatures of the Court Secretary.
(RAJAN GUPTA)
JUDGE
August 24, 2009
‘rajpal’