Posted On by &filed under High Court, Madhya Pradesh High Court.


Madhya Pradesh High Court
Vivek Kumar Jaiswal vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 1 November, 2011
                                                                 1.....


                       W.P. No. 11085 of 2011




01.11.2011

        None for the petitioner.
        Shri Vivek Agrawal, G.A. for the respondent/State.

Shri Naman Nagrath, learned Addl. A.G. for the respondent
No.2.

It is stated by Shri Agrawal that this petition has rendered
infructuous because this matter relates to examination which was
conducted in the month of July,2011 and by efflux of time, the
relief prayed in the petition could not be granted.

As none is appearing on behalf of the petitioner, in view of
the statement made by Shri Vivek Agrawal, this petition is
dismissed as rendered infructuous with no order as to costs.
However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to reagitate the
matter in case grievance of the petitioner is not redressed till
date.




     (Krishn Kumar Lahoti)                   (Smt. Vimla Jain)
          JUDGE                                    JUDGE
vj
 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *

10 queries in 0.169 seconds.