High Court Kerala High Court

Wales Mathew vs University Of Calicut on 23 September, 2009

Kerala High Court
Wales Mathew vs University Of Calicut on 23 September, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 26664 of 2009(C)


1. WALES MATHEW
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT,
                       ...       Respondent

2. CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS

                For Petitioner  :SRI.RANJITH XAVIER

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice P.N.RAVINDRAN

 Dated :23/09/2009

 O R D E R
                       P.N. RAVINDRAN, J.

               ````````````````````````````````
                     W.P.(C) No. 26664 of 2009 C
               `````````````````````````````````
              Dated this the 23rd day of September, 2009

                          J U D G M E N T

Heard Sri.Ranjith Xavier, the learned counsel appearing for

the petitioner and Sri.P.C.Sasidharan, the learned standing counsel

appearing for the University of Calicut.

2. The petitioner appeared for the eighth semester B.Tech

degree examination in Electrical and Electronics Engineering conducted

by the University of Calicut in June 2009. The results were published in

August 2009. The petitioner failed in the paper “Instrumentation

Systems”. He has, therefore, applied for revaluation of his answer

script in the said paper on 13.08.2009 and also paid the requisite fee as

can be seen from Ext.P2. The petitioner submits that he has passed all

the other semester examinations and that if his answer script in the

paper “Instrumentation Systems” is revalued, he is sure to secure a

pass. He submits that unless the revaluation is expeditiously

conducted, he will not be in a position to go for higher studies or to

seek employment. In this writ petition, the petitioner seeks a writ in

the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to revalue his

WPC.26664/09
: 2 :

answer script in “Instrumentation Systems” for which he appeared in

the eighth semester examination held in June 2009 within a time limit

to be fixed by this Court.

3. Sri.P.C.Sasidharan, the learned standing counsel appearing

for the Calicut University submits that the University will revalue the

petitioner’s answer script in “Instrumentation Systems” and

communicate the result to him, if his application is otherwise in order,

expeditiously, and in any event within eight weeks from today.

In the light of the submission made by the learned standing

counsel, I dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the

respondents to revalue the petitioner’s answer script described in Ext.P2

application and to communicate the results to him, within eight weeks

from today, if his application is otherwise in order.

Sd/-

(P.N. RAVINDRAN, JUDGE)

aks

// True Copy //

P.A. to Judge