Legal Articles Consent Decree Would Not Serve As An Estoppel Where The Compromise Was Vitiated By Fraud, Misrepresentation Or Mistake: SC February 19, 2021 by Sanjeev Sirohi | Leave a Comment While shedding full light on the question of whether a consent decree would or would not serve as an estoppel, a two Judge Bench of the Apex Court comprising of Justice Mohan M Shantanagoudar and Justice Vineet Saran in Compack Enterprises India (P) Ltd vs Beant Singh in Special Leave Petition (Civil) Nos. 2224-2225 of 2021 […] Read more » Consent Decree Would Not Serve As An Estoppel Consent Decree Would Not Serve As An Estoppel Where The Compromise Was Vitiated By Fraud Justice Mohan M. Shantanagoudar
Legal Articles Supreme Court Explains Tests To Be Applied While Sentencing In A Criminal Case October 30, 2019 by Sanjeev Sirohi | Leave a Comment It must be mentioned right at the outset that the Supreme Court most recently on October 22, 2019, in State of Madhya Pradesh vs Udham and others in Criminal Appeal No. 690 of 2014 has briefly explained the three tests to be applied while sentencing in a criminal case. It […] Read more » Justice Ajay Rastogi Justice Mohan M. Shantanagoudar
Legal Articles Witness Can Be Called Interested Only When He/She Derives Some Benefit Seeing An Accused Person Punished: Supreme Court May 3, 2019 by Sanjeev Sirohi | Leave a Comment It has to be remarked right at the outset that in a latest, landmark and laudable judgment titled Sadayappan @ Ganesan Vs. State Represented by Inspector of Police in Criminal Appeal No. 1990 of 2012 delivered on April 26, 2019 has explicitly, elegantly and eruditely ruled while rejecting a defence contention in a criminal appeal […] Read more » Justice Mohan M. Shantanagoudar Justice NV Ramana for himself Sadayappan @ Ganesan Vs. State Witness Can Be Called Interested
Legal India When Can A ‘Cheque Bounce’ Complaint Against Director Of Company Be Quashed? March 11, 2019 by Legal India Admin | Leave a Comment “The law requires that the complaint must contain a specific averment that the Director was in charge of, and responsible for, the conduct of the company’s business at the time when the offence was committed.” The Supreme Court has reiterated that, a ‘cheque bounce’ complaint against a Company and its Director, must contain a specific […] Read more » Cheque Bounce Justice Indira Banerjee Justice Mohan M. Shantanagoudar Justice NV Ramana
