Loading...

Conduct Of Public Bodies Has To Be Fair & Not Arbitrary; Do Not Force Citizens To Approach Courts: SC

| Leave a Comment

  It is a no-brainer that the Apex Court in a latest, landmark and laudable judgment titled Chief Executive Officer And Vice Chairman Gujarat Maritime Board vs Asiatic Steel Industries Ltd And Ors. in Civil Appeal No. 3807 of 2020 (Arising out of SLP (C) NO(S). 28244 of 2015) delivered on November 24, 2020 has […]

Read more »

Duty Of Court To Protect Personal Liberty : Karnataka HC

/ | Leave a Comment

It is most refreshing, most rejoicing and most rejuvenating to learn that the Karnataka High Court in a latest, landmark and laudable judgment titled Mr. Rakesh Shetty vs. 1. State of Karnataka, 2. Chandrakanth Ramalingam in Criminal Petition No. 5445/2020 has cited the recent extremely laudable order passed by the Supreme Court Bench of Justice […]

Read more »

If State Govts Targets Individual They Must Realise That SC Is Here To Protect Them; Tells HCs To Protect Human Liberty: SC

| Leave a Comment

It cannot be denied that if Arnab Goswami was able to step freely out of prison after 8 days, it is only and only because of the Bench of Justice Dr DY Chandrachud and Justice Indira Banerjee of Apex Court who were listening his interim bail plea along with three others! The Apex Court order […]

Read more »

Officers Authorised To Investigate NDPS Cases Are Police Officers And Confessional Statements Made To Them Are Not Admissible: SC

| Leave a Comment

It is remarkable, refreshing, rejuvenating and most relaxing to see that just recently on October 29, 2020, a three Judge Bench of the Apex Court comprising of Justice RF Nariman, Justice Indira Banerjee and Justice Navin Sinha in a latest, landmark and laudable judgment titled Tofan Singh vs State of Tamil Nadu in Criminal Appeal […]

Read more »

Right Of Accused Should Not Become Illusory By Imposition Of Disproportionate Bail Conditions: SC

| Leave a Comment

It is good to see that the Apex Court as recently as on October 1, 2020 in a thought provoking judgment titled Parvez Noordin Lokhandwalla vs. State of Maharashtra in Criminal Appeal No. 648 of 2020 manifested its genuine, grave and generous concerns for accused also who is usually condemned very soon even before the […]

Read more »

Circumstances Not Put To An Accused Under Section 313 CrPC Cannot Be Used Against Him: SC

| Leave a Comment

             It is most reassuring, most refreshing and most remarkable to note that as recently as on September 28, 2020, the Supreme Court in a latest, landmark and laudable judgment titled Maheshwar Tigga vs State of Jharkhand in Criminal Appeal No. 635 of 2020 (Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 393 of 2020) has made […]

Read more »

Right To Property Is A Constitutional As Well As Human Right: Supreme Court

/ | Leave a Comment

In a well-balanced, well-reasoned, well-analysed and well-articulated judgment, a two Judge Bench of Supreme Court comprising of Justice Indu Malhotra and Justice Indira Banerjee in Hari Krishna Mandir Trust vs State of Maharashtra in Civil Appeal No. 6156 of 2013 delivered on August 7, 2020 reiterated that the right to property is still a constitutional […]

Read more »

Supreme Court Reiterates Basic Principles Of Judicial Review Of Administrative Decisions

| Leave a Comment

“Judicial review under Article 226 is directed, not against the decision, but the decision making process.” The Supreme Court, in a judgment delivered on Thursday, reiterated some basic principles of judicial review of administrative decisions. The bench comprising Justice R. Banumathi and Justice Indira Banerjee were considering an appeal (Sarvepalli Ramaiah vs. The District Collector, […]

Read more »

When Can A ‘Cheque Bounce’ Complaint Against Director Of Company Be Quashed?

| Leave a Comment

“The law requires that the complaint must contain a specific averment that the Director was in charge of, and responsible for, the conduct of the company’s business at the time when the offence was committed.” The Supreme Court has reiterated that, a ‘cheque bounce’ complaint against a Company and its Director, must contain a specific […]

Read more »
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies. More Information